2020-08-29 02:39:38 -0600 | commented answer | Where to find implementation of BFMatcher::match Thank you! |
2020-08-29 02:39:00 -0600 | marked best answer | Where to find implementation of BFMatcher::match I want to study the implementation of BFMatcher to make some modifications. I have found this file: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/blob..., which contains implementation of ocl_match in BFMatcher, but I am not able to find any implementation for ordinary match. Where can I find the code that executes when BFMatcher.match(...) is called if HAVE_OPENCL is not true? Thanks! |
2020-08-29 02:39:00 -0600 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2020-08-29 02:38:57 -0600 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2020-08-29 00:17:08 -0600 | asked a question | Where to find implementation of BFMatcher::match Where to find implementation of BFMatcher::match I want to study the implementation of BFMatcher to make some modificati |
2015-05-07 16:59:43 -0600 | commented question | No SURF Feature Detector Sorry for the very very late response but yes, I was using OpenCV 3.0 - thanks for the comments! I just fixed my problem. |
2015-03-10 17:19:59 -0600 | asked a question | No SURF Feature Detector I'm trying to follow this tutorial: http://docs.opencv.org/doc/tutorials/... However I get the error: undefined reference to `cv::SURF::SURF(double, int, int, bool, bool)' I looked here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16... but linker is not an option after I try "Project->Properties". I've also tried using Star Feature Detector instead but this does not return any keypoints. |
2014-08-10 22:21:27 -0600 | commented question | Problem with Hamming Matcher @Guanta, if you too believe that this is a bug, would there be some better place to file an official ticket? |
2014-08-09 07:49:11 -0600 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2014-08-09 01:29:36 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2014-08-08 17:07:44 -0600 | asked a question | Problem with Hamming Matcher I'm running into issues that lead me to believe that Hamming matcher is not working as expected (or at least, not as I expect). Consider the following code (please run it if you have the appropriate packages installed): This gives the following output: which is, of course, nonsensical because the Hamming distance should be symmetric. Is there some subtlety in the way the Hamming matcher works that I am missing? Thank you all EDIT: The example transferred to current OpenCV 2.4.9-version gives same output |
2014-06-14 17:41:03 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2014-06-14 17:40:04 -0600 | asked a question | Enable SSE2 I'm running on a machine (Intel i5) that runs SSE2, but when I run OpenCV code the CV_SSE2 sections never run. Is there an easy way to enable this without re installing? I'm running Ubuntu 13.04 and Eclipse CDT, but I can change to command line if necessary. Thanks |
2014-02-25 04:35:17 -0600 | asked a question | Problem 'Installing' OpenCV Ubuntu 13.10 I recently found a paper with source code avaiable so I've been trying to get this to run; I believe I installed OpenCV itself correctly but when I try to use CMake to generate the proper makefiles for the code I'm trying to run, I get the following error. Can someone shed some light on this situation? The only line in that cmake file that changes OpenCV_FOUND is: |