2014-01-22 06:13:00 -0600 | commented question | 'Intel License Agreement' intentional? Thanks again. I've filed a bug-report, at http://code.opencv.org/issues/3498 |
2014-01-21 11:14:39 -0600 | commented question | 'Intel License Agreement' intentional? Thanks for your response. This situation strikes me as needlessly confusing. As far as I can tell, this 'Intel License Agreement' doesn't actually exist - OpenCV is simply released under the BSD license. I'm not working for a company with nervous lawyers, but if I were, I'm sure this kind of thing (hinting at non-standard licenses) wouldn't help matters regarding adopting OpenCV. |
2014-01-20 09:01:56 -0600 | asked a question | 'Intel License Agreement' intentional? Having downloaded OpenCV for Linux, I have found mention of the 'Intel License Agreement' in many of the source files. Is this intended? The OpenCV home page describes OpenCV as being released under a BSD license. Assuming this to be true, there is surely no need to make mention of a non-standard license such as the 'Intel License Agreement'. If I run this from the main OpenCV directory, I find countless results: find . -type f -exec grep -l "Intel License Agreement" {} \; but some files, such as modules/superres/src/frame_source.cpp , make no mention of the Intel License Agreement. If this is not intended, I shall file a bug-report. |