2020-06-12 01:31:18 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-05-02 04:22:23 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-01-11 09:04:41 -0600 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2017-01-11 09:04:40 -0600 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2017-01-11 09:04:37 -0600 | commented answer | Aruco marker tracking with fixed camera @Tetragramm Thanks! Very helpful. I believe I would be defining a world system and that makes sense. Had not thought about in those terms. Gives me some guidance on what to pay attention to in examples now. |
2017-01-10 23:21:22 -0600 | asked a question | Aruco marker tracking with fixed camera I'm trying to implement a tracking system for small robots essentially on a like a table top arena or maybe slightly bigger. I want to be able to track their position/rotation and radio it back to the robot to close the loop on it's navigation. I believe Aruco markers would be ideal in this case allowing me to track position/rotation/id where I can use the id to radio back to the robot with that position. However, my concern is that most of, if not all examples I see around this are related to figuring out the camera's pose with the camera moving as well as possibly the markers. In my case the camera would be static in that it would be fixed above the arena would be more focused on the rotation/position of the robots and their distance from each other in a 2d plane in this case. To give a rough idea of arena size maybe 2m x 2m surface and the camera would just be high enough to have the arena in frame if that helps. Given that setup with a static camera looking down and just moving markers I have a few questions
I have tried to do as much research as possibly but it seems like I'm going slightly against the grain here so most of what I've found I'm reading between the lines, however, it does feel like it would work for my purposes... |