2017-01-07 07:01:10 -0600 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2015-12-23 08:46:08 -0600 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2014-03-04 09:23:08 -0600 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2014-01-02 10:10:19 -0600 | asked a question | Reason for not having optimized versions of matrix multiplication functions? Hello there. I'd like to know if there's any reason for using generic template and not having partially-specified versions of this code which uses some of simd intrinsics? As far as I understand, this code (at least it's part inside of CV_ENABLE_UNROLLED) should be optimized by compiler, but e.g. MSVC 12.0 is unable to produce optimized code for T=uchar, because of saturation code that is used. |
2013-10-16 07:23:10 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2013-10-16 06:12:48 -0600 | asked a question | Plans on moving to C++11 Are there any plans or milestones considering moving towards c++11 support? As for me, most of all i'm interested in support of rvalues, since it seems to give quite a performance boost |