2019-07-16 00:26:15 -0600 | marked best answer | DNN module different results on windows and ubuntu for a custom yolov2 based model[SOLVED] System information (version)
Detailed descriptionI have a custom network based on tiny yolov2 and it is trained using the darknet framework. Now when i do inference using this network on windows the results are as expected, But on ubuntu results are very different and not as expected. - on windows
I have tried different version of opencv (4.01, 3.4.4, 3.4.2) and on windows the results are always correct but on ubuntu thery are always wrong. Also i have tried darknet's C++ API and results in it are correct on both windows and ubuntu but i cannot use it because its CPU inference is very slow compared to opencv's. Also it might look as if only the bbox's are wrong but sometimes the number of objects detected are are also less on ubuntu compared to windows. The issue seems to be only for this network, i have tried tiny-yolov3, tiny-yolov2 and SSD on both windows and ubuntu and they work fine on both platforms. Steps to reproduce (more) |
2019-07-15 21:48:28 -0600 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2019-07-15 08:44:35 -0600 | answered a question | DNN module different results on windows and ubuntu for a custom yolov2 based model[SOLVED] The issue was related to region layer's output anchor size normalization and was in solved in PR #14070 as mentioned by |
2019-07-12 02:53:46 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2019-07-12 02:53:46 -0600 | edited question | DNN module different results on windows and ubuntu for a custom yolov2 based model[SOLVED] DNN module different results on windows and ubuntu for a custom yolov2 based model System information (version) OpenCV |
2019-07-12 02:51:52 -0600 | asked a question | DNN module different results on windows and ubuntu for a custom yolov2 based model[SOLVED] DNN module different results on windows and ubuntu for a custom yolov2 based model System information (version) OpenCV |
2019-05-06 02:17:18 -0600 | commented answer | How to process output of detection network when batch of images is used as network input thanks was able to parse network output using this information. |
2019-05-06 02:17:09 -0600 | commented answer | How to process output of detection network when batch of images is used as network input thanks man was able to parse network output using this information. |
2019-05-06 00:28:42 -0600 | asked a question | How to process output of detection network when batch of images is used as network input How to process output of detection network when batch of images is used as network input I have a yolov3 network trained |
2017-10-07 00:36:49 -0600 | asked a question | cv::cudacodec::VideoReader unable to Play rtsp stream cv::cudacodec::VideoReader unable to Play rtsp stream System information OpenCV => 3.3.0 Operating System / Platfor |
2017-10-06 01:02:46 -0600 | commented question | Can't open RTSP stream with OpenCV cuda video_reader @gopalkildoliya i am also facing the same error. were you able to solve this ? |
2017-09-13 01:33:38 -0600 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2017-09-11 08:36:55 -0600 | asked a question | Why does cuda::VideoCapture consumes more memory than videocapture Why does cuda::VideoCapture consumes more memory than videocapture I have created a simple program which plays a 1280 x |
2016-04-29 02:10:34 -0600 | asked a question | Segmentation Fault When OpenCV Program run as a Video Filter Plugin for VLC I Downloaded the OpenCV 3.1 source code and compiled it using MinGW. Make Files are generated using CMake. I also turned on the CMake_GNUtoMS option CMake so that .lib files are generated along with .a files. Now i have written a VLC OpenCV filter which conatins Code for FaceDetection (reference). This filter compiles fine (linked to opencv_world310.lib) but when i run a test program which tells VLC to use this Filter i get a Segmentation Fault at Filter code: BUT when i run the FaceDetection Code as a independent program (linked against the same .lib/.a and Using Same opencv_world310.dll) it Works Good. ERROR that i get: (more) |