Ask Your Question

danieloberhoff's profile - activity

2020-04-25 08:16:28 -0600 received badge  Famous Question (source)
2019-07-26 04:28:15 -0600 received badge  Good Question (source)
2016-10-08 20:30:39 -0600 received badge  Notable Question (source)
2015-06-22 04:48:00 -0600 received badge  Popular Question (source)
2014-10-09 07:17:02 -0600 received badge  Nice Question (source)
2013-02-04 11:35:11 -0600 commented answer realtime video stabilization

yes, this should work. since I am looking at frame by frame changes I can drastically reduce the search space. wow, so simple, yet so beautiful :).

2013-02-04 07:26:54 -0600 commented answer realtime video stabilization

response to edit: ah, ok, get it. though this only works for shifts. in reality there is also rotation and 3d effects, though maybe this is enough. thanks a lot!

2013-02-04 07:24:43 -0600 received badge  Supporter (source)
2013-02-04 05:12:29 -0600 received badge  Student (source)
2013-02-04 04:34:21 -0600 commented answer realtime video stabilization

Hi, thanks for the answer. I dont understand what you do in step 4. How is your voting set up? I never saw hough voting to match point sets. Also, how do you match? Do you extract descriptors? I was thinking about using ORB. is there a particular reason you do not use the matchers provided by opencv? 1ms sounds very nice!

2013-02-03 05:10:46 -0600 asked a question realtime video stabilization

Hi,

We need a real-time method of video stabilization that does not hog the cpu too much. we also have a gpu in the machine and already do un-distortion and soon also background subtraction there. the camera is fixed, and many features are constantly visible, if that helps. do you have any hints on where best to start to solve this? I have been playing with the stabilization module, but found it to be orders of magnitude too slow. also, does it work online?

Very thankful for any hints, and great work btw! without opencv we wouldnt be close to where we are now (soccercam.nl).

Daniel