I give double vectors with following example values; (don't think about "Blas1")
Blas1 2.92631e-18
Blas1 3.98388e-20
Blas1 9.31403e-19
Blas1 6.41224e-19
Blas1 8.68721e-24
Blas1 1.07387e-21
Blas1 5.82306e-21
Blas1 2.36567e-18
Blas1 5.5498e-19
Blas1 2.93748e-19
Blas1 2.54335e-18
Blas1 1.92756e-23
Blas1 5.49794e-20
Blas1 4.14459e-20
Blas1 8.69651e-20
Blas1 2.97606e-21
Blas1 2.81848e-23
Blas1 2.37574e-21
Blas1 2.49897e-19
Blas1 3.69965e-20
Blas1 8.56015e-20
Blas1 7.00554e-20
Blas1 2.38473e-18
Blas1 1.19531e-24
Blas1 4.78057e-19
Blas1 3.69334e-20
Blas1 5.75832e-20
Blas1 1.46834e-21
Blas1 1.33062e-19
Blas1 1.41787e-19
Blas1 5.04448e-20
Blas1 1.94257e-18
Blas1 2.97708e-19
Blas1 6.41224e-19
Blas1 1.16371e-23
Blas1 3.79272e-20
Blas1 4.31626e-23
Blas1 3.14873e-18
Blas1 3.23783e-23
Blas1 8.00364e-26
Blas1 1.08844e-19
Blas1 9.714e-18
Blas1 4.06371e-20
Blas1 1.866e-19
Blas1 5.05251e-25
Blas1 2.39448e-21
Blas1 9.57913e-19
Blas1 4.84601e-22
However, after the normalization step they are all casted to 0. All of the values are kept as double. Is it a bug or impossible expectation to process such small numbers?