 | 1 | initial version |
Does anyone have some insight as to how to reduce the type II error rate to a very low rate, even at the expense of increasing the type I error rate?
In other words, we want to make sure an imposter would not be recognized as an authorized user even if we end up rejecting a high percentage of authorized user.
Thanks for any help/idea
| | 2 | retagged |
Does anyone have some insight as to how to reduce the type II error rate to a very low rate, even at the expense of increasing the type I error rate?
In other words, we want to make sure an imposter would not be recognized as an authorized user even if we end up rejecting a high percentage of authorized user.
Thanks for any help/idea
