OE 26. Samples [closed]
Hi,
I think some users can give some ideas about this wiki. Where can we open a thread about it ?
These are evolution proposals, you can read more about them here: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki...
Issues list for discussions: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/labe...
Asked: 2018-03-06 03:10:18 -0600
Seen: 317 times
Last updated: Mar 07 '18
Couldn't load native_sample: findLibrary returned null opencv4android
How can I measure performance of OpenCV4Android samples on several devices?
command not found linux opencv
OpenCV Error:Bad argument (Can not Get new Positive sample)
JNI UnsatisfiedLinkError when running ant sample on Ubuntu
using EM of opencv, same training samples, but different results
OpenCV java samples with eclipse [closed]
Positive samples on transparent background for trainingcascade
See the corresponding discussion.
I think they should enable projects tab to list the evolution proposals and have a better visibility than the wiki page or the issues category.
@Eduardo, highlight me on where or how there will be a discussion ? who might (be allowed to) participate ?
@LBerger, i rather vote to reopen this
@berak Reopen why not? but issue is (may be) a good place too. When we will be too many we 'll think about it (allow or not)
About sample now :
May be a sample list is necessary and we can vote for a sample (up or down)
Is it possible to define standard keys for a sample (as q to quit) ?
Is it possible to run a sample without data file (only simulated data)? can we add a file browser in opencv ?
well, oh might just say: IF those issues are an invitation to participate, vpisarev somehow failed to make that clear..
" IF those issues are an invitation to participate, vpisarev somehow failed to make that clear.." waiting an answer too @mshabunin
but titles are "OE .... discussion"
the wiki is read-only
Yes wiki is read only but What do you think of Keep 2.4 branch and review/accept PRs coming to it. For now (2018 Spring) we plan to do it for at least 1 more year. Later on, there can be some volunteers engaged to review the patches.
and "Disclaiming binary compatibility and moving to source-level compatibility" great new