Revision history [back]

the discussion, which formula is the 'correct' one is probably as old as opencv, they changed it this way and that, and finally came up with having both.. here's some tests on att:

Lbp    H_CHI_ALT    0.973
Lbp    H_CHI           0.945
Lbp    COSINE        0.965
Lbp    HELLINGER   0.981
Lbp    SVM_POLY   0.981
Lbpu  MLP              0.999

unfortunately, atm. there 's no way changing this without hacking the (library)code ;(

the discussion, which formula is the 'correct' one is probably as old as opencv, they changed it this way and that, and finally came up with having both.. here's some tests on att:

Lbp    H_CHI_ALT    0.973
Lbp    H_CHI           0.945
Lbp    COSINE        0.965
Lbp    HELLINGER   0.981
Lbp    SVM_POLY   0.981
Lbpu  MLP              0.999

unfortunately, atm. there 's no way changing this without hacking the (library)code ;(

the discussion, which formula is the 'correct' one is probably as old as opencv, they changed it this way and that, and finally came up with having both.. here's some tests on att:

Lbp    H_CHI_ALT    0.973
Lbp    H_CHI        0.945
Lbp    COSINE      0.965
Lbp    HELLINGER   0.981
Lbp    SVM_POLY   0.981
Lbpu  MLP        0.999

unfortunately, atm. there 's no way changing this without hacking the (library)code ;(