This forum is disabled, please visit https://forum.opencv.org
 | 1 | initial version |
I see two points: a) Why do you pass the CV_CALIB_FIX_PRINCIPAL_POINT-Flag? b) The computation of the obj-Vector is strange. This vector should contain the 3d-positions of the corners in the marker frame (in a metric coordinate system [Or imperial, if you are living in Liberia, Myanmar or the US]).
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
I see two points:
points:
a) Why do you pass the CV_CALIB_FIX_PRINCIPAL_POINT-Flag?
b) The computation of the obj-Vector is strange. This vector should contain the 3d-positions of the corners in the marker frame (in a metric coordinate system [Or imperial, if you are living in Liberia, Myanmar or the US]).| | 3 | No.3 Revision |
I see two points:
a) Why do you pass the CV_CALIB_FIX_PRINCIPAL_POINT-Flag?
b) The computation of the obj-Vector is strange. This vector should contain the 3d-positions of the corners in the marker frame (in a metric coordinate system [Or imperial, if you are living in Liberia, Myanmar or the US]). Your first point is at (0,0,0) and the second one at (0.1,1,0) which is no valid position.
