2019-08-27 02:35:16 -0600 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2019-08-19 09:26:55 -0600 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2019-08-19 09:19:00 -0600 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2019-08-15 04:39:23 -0600 | marked best answer | python ret value vastly different from reprojection error In this question, I am referring to the documentation example given here: https://docs.opencv.org/4.1.0/dc/dbb/... To give a short summary: It's an example on how to calibrate a camera using a chessboard-pattern. In the example the author calibrates the camera like this: It is stated in the documentation, that the ret-value is supposed to be the overall RMS of the reprojection error: (Check: https://docs.opencv.org/4.1.0/d9/d0c/...) However, at the end of the script, the author calculates the reprojection error like this: So this does - to my understanding - calculate the average normed reprojection-error per point per image. However, this is vastly different from the ret-value, that is given back to the user by calibrateCamera. Running the code and comparing the results leads to the results: These are an order of maginute different and I think that should not be the case, ...right (?!) And the more important question: It is often stated, that the most important value to define "a good calibration" is a reprojection error < 1 and close to zero. Which reprojection error should be used for that? I really hope someone can answer this question as it has been bugging me for a week now. Cheers, Dennis |
2019-08-15 04:39:22 -0600 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2019-08-15 04:38:56 -0600 | answered a question | python ret value vastly different from reprojection error I found this on StackOverflow, which answers the question. The sum must be calculated inside the root. However the formu |
2019-08-14 06:59:16 -0600 | edited answer | Problem in copying part of image to another Because "part" in your example provides an undefined array. Your Image has the width 1000, but you're indexing 1080 to 1 |
2019-08-14 06:59:16 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2019-08-14 06:58:49 -0600 | answered a question | Problem in copying part of image to another Because "part" in your example provides an undefined array. Your Image has the width 1000, but you're indexing 1080 to 1 |
2019-08-14 06:37:19 -0600 | answered a question | Point correspondences for camera calibration using non-standard pattern I'm not sure it works with only one point. Costum Calibration patterns are however possible with openCV. https://www.yo |
2019-08-14 04:12:53 -0600 | asked a question | python ret value vastly different from reprojection error python ret value vastly different from reprojection error In this question, I am referring to the documentation example |
2019-08-02 03:22:22 -0600 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2019-08-02 03:22:17 -0600 | marked best answer | size of distCoeffs Dear Forum, how is the size of the distortion vector chosen by the program? Does it only depend on the type of the camera lens model (Fisheye, etc.)? If not, can one set a preferred size for the distCoeffs somehow? Cheers, Dennis |
2019-08-02 02:10:39 -0600 | answered a question | size of distCoeffs i found a working solution for me, using the flag CALIB_RATIONAL_MODEL in calibrateCamera. The documentation provides t |
2019-07-31 02:10:33 -0600 | asked a question | size of distCoeffs size of distCoeffs Dear Forum, how is the size of the distortion vector chosen by the program? Does it only depend on t |