This forum is disabled, please visit https://forum.opencv.org
| 2019-01-09 10:22:51 -0600 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
| 2019-01-09 04:42:35 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
| 2019-01-09 04:42:35 -0600 | edited answer | LSH matching very slow I had the same issue with LSH descriptor matching. I have played around quite a bit with the parameters. I found that th |
| 2019-01-09 04:40:54 -0600 | answered a question | LSH matching very slow I had the same issue with LSH descriptor matching. I have played around quite a bit with the parameters. I found that th |
| 2018-08-13 08:50:23 -0600 | answered a question | How to filter FREAK+BruteForceMatcher result? To answer this question more completely, it is worth mentionning that FREAK is a local binary descriptor, that is to say |
| 2018-06-08 04:03:57 -0600 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
| 2018-04-27 04:24:29 -0600 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
| 2018-04-27 04:14:07 -0600 | commented answer | Earth Mover's Distance EMD() results in memory access error I have the same issue: with 16k rows I get a write access exception but if I reduce the size, just to confirm this is th |
| 2018-04-27 04:13:28 -0600 | commented answer | Earth Mover's Distance EMD() results in memory access error I have the same issue: with 16k rows I get a write access exception but if I reduce the size, just to confirm this is th |
| 2018-04-27 03:54:28 -0600 | answered a question | EMD vs EMDL1: who is right? Hi, These two functions do not compute the same thing : cv::EMD(<params>) takes the point's coordinates into acco |