2019-02-19 12:45:34 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-12-29 02:04:20 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-02-20 17:16:15 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2013-08-26 01:37:36 -0600 | commented answer | How to read/write a PCA object from/to a cv::FileStorage ? Merci Mathieu :-) |
2013-08-23 09:17:19 -0600 | commented answer | Why do the values returned from Brisk's smoothedIntensity it are very large, much larger than intensity values? Sorry, I'm not sure of my memory here... but as far as I remember, BRISK does not do any cross-ring diferences (unlike FREAK, but FREAK normalizes by the area). |
2013-08-23 06:45:22 -0600 | commented answer | Why do the values returned from Brisk's smoothedIntensity it are very large, much larger than intensity values? The sigma sets the width of the neighborhood. For such small sizes, integral images are a decent approximation to Gaussian smoothing (and you will learn by experience that many CV research papers implement the same trick and name it Gaussian...). You really should have a look at FREAK's source that is more geared towards what you plan to do. |
2013-08-23 04:10:54 -0600 | answered a question | Why do the values returned from Brisk's smoothedIntensity it are very large, much larger than intensity values? I'm not sure BRISK is not already doing what you are trying to do. Here is the algorithmic principle to build a BRISK descriptor:
This mechanism was first exposed in the BRIEF paper, and I also descrcibe it in a blog post. Now, the answers to your questions:
If you look at FREAK, you will see an example of a descriptor where the size of the neighborhoods varies and where a normalization by each area is performed. |
2013-08-23 03:58:48 -0600 | commented answer | How to read/write a PCA object from/to a cv::FileStorage ? I'll write the small code and make the PR later this year when I get more time, it does not seem to be urgent yet. |
2013-05-17 03:59:12 -0600 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2013-01-07 14:07:32 -0600 | commented question | error while compiling FREAK demo Wow... I don't know for your particular case (sorry). However, the 2.4.3 version may not work with the original FREAK demo from github, because the BruteForceMatcher class is not defined in the same way. So it should be easier for you to try from OpenCV's FREAK version first (both are very close). |
2012-12-30 14:16:31 -0600 | answered a question | SIFT Feature Descriptor Doesn't Work With ORB Keypoinys Not sure of what's happening in your case because I can't find the documentation for the SiftDescriptorExtractor class. Did you however try with the original SIFT class ? The code to compute the descriptors in your case becomes: |
2012-12-28 14:47:44 -0600 | commented question | Optical Flow Arrow Tips Pointing the Wrong Way Isn't the mistake in your atan2 call ? If your vector is PQ, then you should have some Q-P almost everywhere. |
2012-12-27 06:01:47 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2012-12-27 06:01:04 -0600 | answered a question | FREAK selectPairs Error Your syntax is incorrect. Since So you have write something like this instead: |
2012-12-26 03:51:47 -0600 | answered a question | How to read/write a PCA object from/to a cv::FileStorage ? OK, I figured out myself a small workaround. According to the code in the It should do the trick (at least until the attributes get private :-/ ). |
2012-12-04 15:50:43 -0600 | asked a question | How to read/write a PCA object from/to a cv::FileStorage ? Dear all, I'm trying to save (and subsequently reuse) to a However, the Is what I want to do possible ? And in this case, could someone please point me to the methods that would be useful in my case,? Thanks in advance. |
2012-11-29 05:40:40 -0600 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2012-11-06 04:01:03 -0600 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2012-11-06 02:25:16 -0600 | answered a question | OpenCV 2.4.3 build on MacOS 10.6.8 fails
Hope this helps ! |
2012-11-05 12:10:40 -0600 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2012-11-05 11:26:09 -0600 | answered a question | Is FREAK scale and rotation invariant? It's actually a little bit more subtle: the pairs used by FREAK were chosen for their matching performance after a scale-sensitive detection of keypoints (the KP detector used is the same as BRISK, i.e. a multi-scale FAST + orientation detection). Hence, FREAK is rotation and scale invariant only up to the sensitivity of this detector and is not per se invariant. |