Revision history [back]

that's strange in opencv 3.0 it is possible and in [opencv 2.4.11](http://docs.opencv.org/modules/imgproc/doc/filtering.html?highlight=medianblur#medianblur)

May be it's a problem when result is shown?

that's strange in opencv 3.0 it is possible and in [opencv 2.4.11](http://docs.opencv.org/modules/imgproc/doc/filtering.html?highlight=medianblur#medianblur)opencv 2.4.11`

May be it's a problem when result is shown?

that's strange in opencv 3.0 it is possible and in opencv 2.4.11`

May be it's a problem when result is shown?

that's strange in opencv 3.0 it is possible and in opencv 2.4.11`

May be it's a problem when result is shown?shown? try

double min, max;
cv::minMaxLoc(depthMat , &min, &max);
try  cv::imshow("*DepthMat"+cameraID, cv::imshow("******DepthMat******"+cameraID, (depthMat-min) /(max-min)255);
/(max-min)*255);

that's strange in opencv 3.0 it is possible and in opencv 2.4.11`

May be it's a problem when result is shown? try

double min, max;
cv::minMaxLoc(depthMat , &min, &max);
 cv::imshow("******DepthMat******"+cameraID, (depthMat-min) /(max-min)*255);
/(max-min));

that's strange It's possible in opencv 3.0 it is possible and in opencv 2.4.11`` but size must be less than 5

double min, max;
cv::minMaxLoc(depthMat , &min, &max);
 cv::imshow("******DepthMat******"+cameraID, (depthMat-min) /(max-min));

It's possible in opencv 3.0 it is possible and in opencv 2.4.11` but size must be less than 5