2018-01-04 20:54:36 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-04-13 08:12:17 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-02-01 08:18:37 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-09-02 07:26:02 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-06-15 01:26:19 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-04-29 09:08:30 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-09-12 23:51:33 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2014-06-16 18:18:36 -0600 | commented answer | OpenCL in OpenCV 3.0.0 I don't have CUDA, so that program will not work. I have an Intel GPU and I'm using Beignet, which is Intel's implementation of OpenCL. Can you please try your (first) program without CUDA and see how it works? NVIDIA should also have an implementation of OpenCL, so you should be able to use it. |
2014-06-16 15:21:31 -0600 | commented answer | OpenCL in OpenCV 3.0.0 Have you tried using only OpenCL (no CUDA)? I'm having the same issue with your example... |
2014-06-14 17:19:30 -0600 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2014-06-14 17:16:20 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2014-06-14 17:13:11 -0600 | commented answer | OpenCL in OpenCV 3.0.0 Things are still slowing down to a crawl - please see my revised question with code. |
2014-06-14 17:10:39 -0600 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2014-05-26 23:07:05 -0600 | asked a question | OpenCL in OpenCV 3.0.0 I'm attempting to use OpenCV 3.0.0 (yes, I know it's a development version) to work with OpenCL. I'm using the UMat structure instead of the ocl::oclMat structure found in earlier versions. As expected, those matrices are getting created on the GPU side. However, when I attempt to run GaussianBlur for example on those matrices, things slow down to a crawl. Earlier, this would have been solved by using ocl::GaussianBlur, but that does not exist anymore. How is one supposed to achieve this in OpenCV 3.0? EDIT Now that I have ostensibly enabled using OpenCL for dealing with UMats, things are still slowing down to a crawl. Here is the code that I am currently using to test this out: EDIT 2 Changing the gpuFrame to be a regular matrix seems to have solved the issue. Thank you! :) Edit 3 I seem to have spoken too soon --- changing gpuFrame to a regular Mat object fixed everything because everything then became CPU computations! Why is it that I cannot do multiple computations using OpenCL and not have the GPU freeze up? In my dmesg, it says the following whenever I run my program: This seems to suggest that my loop is going too quickly. But the GPU should be quicker at computations (especially matrix computations) than a CPU, right? So what's going on? Thank you very much! Sincerely, Chaanakya |
2014-05-26 23:02:10 -0600 | commented question | OpenCV + Asus Xtion sensor Thanks kbarni - I did change that variable and the result does work. How exactly do you do a) though? I'd like to do that if possible. Thanks! |
2014-05-18 12:11:25 -0600 | commented question | OpenCV + Asus Xtion sensor Does SamplesConfig.xml have anything at all to do with this not working? It seems that it should read /etc/openni/SamplesConfig.xml. However, I don't think it's doing that, since a) PCL worked (and works) just fine and b) nothing I do is actually changing the behavior of OpenCV. |
2014-05-17 00:44:39 -0600 | asked a question | OpenCV + Asus Xtion sensor Dear all, I am having trouble getting the Asus Xtion sensor to work with the OpenCV framework. I know (or at least I believe) the problem is not my laptop as I have an example program working with PCL (the Point Cloud Library). I am using Debian Sid with a custom compiled OpenCV (to ensure support for OpenNI and the Xtion sensor). The following code is what should work, but is not: This code compiles just fine. When I run it, however, with the Xtion sensor plugged in, it gives me the following output: What exactly is going on and how do I fix it? I have tried searching on Google and haven't found anything useful except for other people with the same problem and no responses. Thank you very much in advance. Sincerely, Chaanakya |