2020-08-13 13:01:47 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-07-02 08:18:27 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-05-18 21:48:32 -0600 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2019-05-08 20:03:42 -0600 | answered a question | How to detect closing of namedWindow by mouse or ALT+F4 In Python, poll with cv2.getWindowImageRect(windowName). It will return (-1, -1, -1, -1) when the user clicks the window |
2017-08-01 03:47:17 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-05-29 15:52:22 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-09-22 08:41:36 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2014-03-27 11:10:23 -0600 | asked a question | How to control VideoWriter encoding bitrate? Is there a way to control the video codec encoding bitrate in OpenCV? With ffmpeg you can do -qscale n. That will (indirectly) influence the bitrate. Is there an equivalent via the OpenCV Python bindings? The bitrate I get now seems to be around 8 to 10 Mbps, which is really high (quality is excellent of course, but I'm trying to save on bandwidth...) |
2014-03-26 19:08:12 -0600 | asked a question | WaitKey without waiting? Is there a way to call WaitKey without incurring a (minimum) 1 millisecond block? Suppose I have a 300 frames/sec camera & display - to display each frame I need to call waitkey(1) 300 times each second (because you have to call waitkey to get imshow to work), which consumes 30% of my entire CPU. Most of that time is just sitting there waiting for the keyboard, at 1 ms per call. This seems like a huge waste of CPU time. Is there some way to call WaitKey without the needless wait-for-keyboard delay? WaitKey(0.0000000001) I suppose would do it, but WaitKey only takes integers... |
2014-03-26 19:00:22 -0600 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2014-03-26 18:52:27 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2014-03-26 18:50:50 -0600 | asked a question | Test for camera frame available in Python? How can I check if a new frame is available from the camera (without waiting for it)? If I do a cam.grab() it always returns True, even if I just retrieved a frame an instant before. If I then do a cam.retrieve(), that call blocks until the next frame is ready (wasting CPU time that I need for other things). If I call cam.read(), that also blocks until the next frame is ready from the camera. How can I check if a frame is ready without waiting for it? I'd like to do something like this: Is there a way to do this in Python? FWIW, I'm on Win7 using a DirectShow camera. |