2020-01-26 09:27:34 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-07-05 08:21:26 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2015-11-11 07:02:50 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-09-03 13:29:15 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2012-11-09 16:49:45 -0600 | commented question | VideoWriter VideoCapture and uncompressed AVI It seems no one has an easy solution. It's an annoying problem. At least I would like to understand if it's a common problem or if it depends on the specific OpenCV configuration. |
2012-10-30 18:34:56 -0600 | asked a question | VideoWriter VideoCapture and uncompressed AVI Hi everyone, I think a similar issue is reported in a previous unanswered discussion. But I prefer to report my issue with more details. Anyway, I have a problem with cv::VideoCapture when grabbing frames from an uncompressed AVI file created using cv::VideoWriter. Basically the video seems ok when it's played with WMP for instance, but the frames are corrupted when grabbed using cv::VideoCapture (a snapshot here). I'm using OpenCV 2.4.1, built in Windows 7 using Visual Studio 2010, x86, WITH_VIDEOINPUT=ON and WITH_FFMPEG=OFF. Here's a quick code sample: I checked the issue tracker, and the change-log of the latest version, but this problems seems not to be mentioned. So, I suppose I'm missing something. Any help is appreciated! Thanks in advance, Giuliano |
2012-09-07 08:38:57 -0600 | commented question | Memory leak with morphological operators It seems the line of code fixes the issue! What's the explanation? I've never used TBB before. |
2012-09-06 06:44:41 -0600 | commented question | Memory leak with morphological operators If I run erode in a loop, the allocated memory does not increase. There's still only one memory leak. Checking where that memory is allocated, I can see some references to TBB code (starting from morph.cpp:1183). |
2012-09-06 03:06:05 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-09-06 02:27:53 -0600 | commented question | Memory leak with morphological operators Commenting the erode, the leak disappears. Same stuff using "dilate". |
2012-09-04 16:51:29 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2012-09-04 16:43:32 -0600 | asked a question | Memory leak with morphological operators Hi everyone, It might be a stupid question but..why Visual Studio (2010) says there's a memory leak here? I'm using OpenCV 2.4.1 with TBB support. Regards, Giuliano |