This forum is disabled, please visit https://forum.opencv.org
| 2020-04-14 07:06:50 -0600 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
| 2020-04-05 06:44:50 -0600 | commented question | cv::cuda morphology much slower than cv::morphologyEx I now also tried Gaussian Blur, and the CUDA-version is faster for a sufficiently sized kernel. The problem really only |
| 2020-04-05 06:44:33 -0600 | commented question | cv::cuda morphology much slower than cv::morphologyEx I also tried Gaussian Blur, and the CUDA-version is faster for a sufficiently sized kernel. The problem really only seem |
| 2020-04-05 05:49:21 -0600 | commented question | cv::cuda morphology much slower than cv::morphologyEx Thanks for your suggestions. Unfortunately, I do not have another system with an Nvidia Graphics Card that I could test |
| 2020-04-04 11:40:48 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
| 2020-04-04 11:40:48 -0600 | edited question | cv::cuda morphology much slower than cv::morphologyEx cv::cuda morphology much slower than cv::morphologyEx Hi, I am trying to process the two images from a stereo camera fr |
| 2020-04-03 07:56:01 -0600 | asked a question | cv::cuda morphology much slower than cv::morphologyEx cv::cuda morphology much slower than cv::morphologyEx Hi, I am trying to process the two images from a stereo camera fr |