2017-07-02 21:42:27 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2017-01-25 04:10:02 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-03-08 03:45:06 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2015-09-26 17:41:41 -0600 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2015-09-24 09:31:07 -0600 | commented question | 360° Stiching No this doesn't work, because OpenCV loads all images and compare them, so you havent the same image on the other side |
2015-09-23 14:21:41 -0600 | commented question | 360° Stiching Yes you are right! But how to fix this?? |
2015-09-22 14:12:47 -0600 | commented question | 360° Stiching No :). You see on left a bright part and on the right a dark part. This parts are normally not connected, because they are on the opposite side of the panorama. If you render this panorama in a 360° viewer this two sides will be connected and it looks like my picture. I want to make the line where the parts are connected invisible, so you think this is one picture. I think its better to understand if I post a complete picture. (Right now its dark ;)) |
2015-09-22 13:28:44 -0600 | commented question | 360° Stiching Yes, but I have to make a new one, I dont want to publish my garden on the Internet :) It looks like a every 360 degree image, but only horizontal :) |
2015-09-22 13:03:04 -0600 | commented question | 360° Stiching Yes, I tried this, I get the same result. :( |
2015-09-22 08:41:23 -0600 | commented question | 360° Stiching @LBerger The Problem is, that the border isn't in the middle of the image. Is it possible to cut about 500px from the right end and 500px from the beginning, stitch it and replace this area? I am using OpenCV 2.4.11 if this info is necessary. |
2015-09-21 23:35:37 -0600 | asked a question | 360° Stiching Hi, I'm trying to create a 360° Pamorma, so I used the OpenCV Stichling Library. I found an interesting and pretty well working code in github. https://github.com/Itseez/opencv/blob... The result is nearly perfect, but if I render this image as a sphere the color/brightness of the beginning and the end doesn't fit very well. Is there an easy improvement to fix this issue? I don't want to rewrite the complete algorithm. :) |