2018-07-11 21:18:09 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-09-23 20:13:46 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2015-10-15 22:30:00 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-08-11 06:40:52 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2015-02-25 06:08:51 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-01-12 09:36:12 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-01-26 16:14:40 -0600 | commented answer | copy selected row of a matrix to another Thanks for your help. Your function runs pretty well. Later, I figured out the program was due to the generation of src matrix in the previous part of code. This part of code accidentally violate the address access. That causes the memory problem. Now I replace this part and everything works well. I agree that there is not type as CV_32U. |
2013-01-25 16:51:39 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2013-01-25 13:57:14 -0600 | answered a question | Is there a list for new features needed for OpenCV? Hi, This is properly the latest information you can find about machine learning methods that are available in OpenCV. http://docs.opencv.org/trunk/modules/ml/doc/ml.html OpenCV 2.4.3.2 documentation » OpenCV API Reference » Hope it helps. |
2013-01-25 10:51:39 -0600 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2013-01-25 09:38:20 -0600 | commented answer | copy selected row of a matrix to another Thanks, Dniil. That was a silly mistake I made. The error has disappeared. However, the program still crashes in the middle. And the debug shows error in memcpy.asm UnwindUp2: mov eax,[esi+ecx*4-8] ;U(entry)/V(not) - get dword from source ;V(entry) - spare What was the underlying reason for this issue? |
2013-01-25 07:53:52 -0600 | commented answer | compare two rows of a matrix Thanks all the same. Later, I also figured out the problem. |
2013-01-24 15:21:41 -0600 | asked a question | copy selected row of a matrix to another Hi, Thanks for answering my previous question. I have one more related issue. I am still a little confused with the at operator for unknown type matrix. The above code can pass the debug procedure. However, when I run the code, it gives the following error. The matrix indices has the data type int ( 0 to 4294967295). Therefore, the return type should be correct. I don't know which part goes wrong. I also tried at<int>, at<uchar> or other data types. But the error remains. Much appreciated for your help. Update: The error has disappeared. However, the program still crashes in the middle. And the debug shows error in memcpy.asm UnwindUp2: mov eax,[esi+ecx*4-8] ;U(entry)/V(not) - get dword from source ;V(entry) - spare What was the underlying reason for this issue? |
2013-01-23 13:26:20 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2013-01-23 13:24:29 -0600 | asked a question | compare two rows of a matrix Basically, I want to compare two rows from a matrix and return the logic values. It gives the following error, How to resolve this issue? Is it because the operator of row(int i) is wrong? Thanks for your help. |
2013-01-14 14:24:50 -0600 | asked a question | What is the difference between Vec<Mat> and Mat Hi Guys, I got confused with the usage of vector<mat> and Mat. Example: vector<mat> images; images.push_back(imread("example.jpg")); //loop bool CvSVM::train(const Mat& trainData, const Mat& responses, const Mat& varIdx=Mat(), const Mat& sampleIdx=Mat(), CvSVMParams params=CvSVMParams() ) For SVM, it requires the input to be Mat structure. How do you make the conversion? Another question is with the usage of push_back. "The methods add one or more elements to the bottom of the matrix. They emulate the corresponding method of the STL vector class. When elem is Mat , its type and the number of columns must be the same as in the container matrix."-from opencv.org However, is push_back a concatenation operator or just grouping them into a cell structure? You can access data by images[0], images[1],... If you define "Mat images" and then use images.push_back, the result is a concatenation of matrix. Thanks for your clarification. Sorry if the question seems naive. |