This forum is disabled, please visit https://forum.opencv.org
| 2015-06-07 13:01:40 -0600 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
| 2015-01-22 06:49:33 -0600 | received badge | ● Favorite Question (source) |
| 2015-01-22 06:49:18 -0600 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
| 2015-01-14 06:57:41 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2014-03-30 12:56:57 -0600 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
| 2013-12-13 01:11:25 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2013-06-07 04:24:15 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2012-08-14 04:07:30 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
| 2012-07-25 10:32:36 -0600 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
| 2012-07-25 08:40:13 -0600 | commented answer | Object detection slow Wow, really good and exhaustive post. The only thing I'm missing why the test images work faster than my current input, for almost the same size. |
| 2012-07-25 08:39:07 -0600 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
| 2012-07-25 04:43:13 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
| 2012-07-25 04:41:41 -0600 | asked a question | Object detection slow Any ideas why the object detection may be slow? I mean I am trying out the face detection on a 800X600 image and it takes like 1426 ms, which is really slow in my book. Is this right? My test environment is an ASUS K70IC with the following traits. I have built the latest svn trunk version with TBB, CUDA and eigen, (CMAKE File) using the detectMultiScale function with the haarcascades\haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml file. I've also tried 2.4.2 as downloaded from the home site, however the numbers turn out the same. I'm currently running the performance tests for the objdetect module, I'll post them as soon as they are ready however, in the meantime if you have any idea? PS. And the results are in HTML or TXT. However in the test I see a peak of just over 100 by little for the 640X480 images... |