It seems that opencv 3 no longer support HOG Cascade. Why is that?
1 | initial version |
It seems that opencv 3 no longer support HOG Cascade. Why is that?
2 | No.2 Revision |
It seems that opencv 3 no longer support HOG Cascade. Why is that?
in cascadedetect.cpp:
if( featureTypeStr == CC_HAAR )
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::HAAR;
else if( featureTypeStr == CC_LBP )
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::LBP;
else if( featureTypeStr == CC_HOG )
{
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::HOG;
CV_Error(Error::StsNotImplemented, "HOG cascade is not supported in 3.0");
}
else
return false;
3 | No.3 Revision |
It seems that opencv 3 no longer support HOG Cascade. Why is that?
in cascadedetect.cpp:
if( featureTypeStr == CC_HAAR )
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::HAAR;
else if( featureTypeStr == CC_LBP )
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::LBP;
else if( featureTypeStr == CC_HOG )
{
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::HOG;
CV_Error(Error::StsNotImplemented, "HOG cascade is not supported in 3.0");
}
else
return false;
It was working very good and in many cases the results were better than Haar cascade and LBP!!
4 | No.4 Revision |
It seems that opencv 3 no longer support HOG Cascade. Why is that?
in cascadedetect.cpp:
if( featureTypeStr == CC_HAAR )
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::HAAR;
else if( featureTypeStr == CC_LBP )
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::LBP;
else if( featureTypeStr == CC_HOG )
{
featureType = FeatureEvaluator::HOG;
CV_Error(Error::StsNotImplemented, "HOG cascade is not supported in 3.0");
}
else
return false;
It was working very good and in many cases the results were better than Haar cascade and LBP!!LBP!! Moreover, the training time was very good (in my experience 20 times faster than Haar and 2 times faster than LBP).