Revision history [back]

TAPI absolute beginner here. I ported my CV code to make use of UMat intstead of Mat since my CPU was on it's limit, especially morphologic operations seemed to consume quite some computing power.

I cannot see any changes in my framerate, it is exactly the same no matter if I use TAPI or not, also Process Explorer reports no GPU usage whatsoever. I did a small test with a few calls of dilation and closing -- no effect.

Did I miss something I have to do in order to enable TAPI? I'm using the latest OpenCV 3.2 build for Windows and a GTX 980 with driver 378.49. cv::ocl::haveOpenCL() and cv::ocl::useOpenCL() both return true and cv::ocl::Context::getDefault().device( 0 ) also give me the correct device, everything looks good.

Any ideas?

TAPI absolute beginner here. I ported my CV code to make use of UMat intstead of Mat since my CPU was on it's limit, especially morphologic operations seemed to consume quite some computing power.

I cannot see any changes in my framerate, it is exactly the same no matter if I use TAPI or not, also Process Explorer reports no GPU usage whatsoever. I did a small test with a few calls of dilation and closing -- no effect.

Did I miss something I have to do in order to enable TAPI? I'm using the latest OpenCV 3.2 build for Windows and a GTX 980 with driver 378.49. cv::ocl::haveOpenCL() and cv::ocl::useOpenCL() both return true and cv::ocl::Context::getDefault().device( 0 ) also give gives me the correct device, everything looks good.

Any ideas?

TAPI absolute beginner here. I ported my CV code to make use of UMat intstead of Mat since my CPU was on it's limit, especially morphologic operations seemed to consume quite some computing power.

I cannot see any changes in my framerate, it is exactly the same no matter if I use TAPI or not, also Process Explorer reports no GPU usage whatsoever. I did a small test with a few calls of dilation and closing on a full HD image -- no effect.

Did I miss something I have to do in order to enable TAPI? I'm using the latest OpenCV 3.2 build for Windows and a GTX 980 with driver 378.49. cv::ocl::haveOpenCL() and cv::ocl::useOpenCL() both return true and cv::ocl::Context::getDefault().device( 0 ) also gives me the correct device, everything looks good.

Any ideas?ideas? Are there any how-to's, best practices or common pitfalls for using TAPI?