Bag of Words/Featrues + Locality Sensity Hashing for Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) implementation

edit

First of all: I don't know if this the right forum to post this question, I'm sorry if it's not.

I'm trying to implement a Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system.

In order to do that, I'm trying to combine two models:

1. Bag of Features (BoF) for converting an image to a vector (histogram of features)
2. Locality Sensity Hashing to find the most similar image of the given image query (both expressed through vectors, thanks to phase 1).

This is ad-hoc diagram that I created for this question (please, be kind on that, it's like a son for me :D )

We can summarize the entire process in the following steps:

Phase 1: Histogram Creation (Offline, preprocessing):

1. For each image i, compute the set of keypoints and descriptors i1...id, where d is the number of keypoints/descriptors per image
2. Given the whole set of descriptors, run the k-means on that.
3. The result is is the dictionary of features: a matrix k x 128 (if we use SIFT's descriptor) where each row is a centroid
4. Here is my first question: how do we obtain the histogram (so a vector 1xk) for each image i? Someone here suggested me to use the radius of each cluster in order to find the cluster that the descriptor belongs to, but I don't know to implement this.

Phase 2: Query Processing

1. Given query image q, compute keypoints/descriptors q1...qd as before
2. Given the dictionary computed in phase 1, compute the histogram of q. Notice that the same problem in point 4 of phase 1 occurs here again, so the proposed solution must be valid for both dataset and queries images.
3. In order to find the "most similar image", we solve the 1-approximate nearest neighbor problem (1-ANN) through Locality Sensity Hashing algorithm (LSH).

Now that I described the whole procedure, my second question is: is this a good approach for implementing CBIR? There are other solutions? What are the possible pros/cons?