Generating matrix representing nearness to edges [closed]

asked 2016-01-12 13:03:36 -0600

Hi Community!

I'm attempting to improve a hand segmentation algorithm I'm working on, and as an experiment, I'd like to give higher priority to pixels that are near an edge. (My most typical failure case is caused by walls that are similarly colored as skin, but walls often have very few edges compared to hands.)

Anyway, I was getting ready to build a custom algorithm for this, but I can't help but think OpenCV probably has image processing functionality for this. Here's what I want to do: Given a binary image generated by Canny(), I want to produce a matrix of the same size, with floating point values normalized from 0.0 to 1.0, with 1.0 representing an edge pixel, 0.0 representing a pixel that is some fairly large distance from any edge pixels, and intermediate values following a curve, with the value dropping more rapidly the further the pixel is from an edge.

This sounds an awful lot like a Gaussian filter, but there are a couple issues I have with that. First, I'm looking to have some non-zero values for pixels that are pretty far from an edge, so the kernel would have to be very large - hence, very poor performance. Second, running something like GaussianBlur would probably need further post-processing to normalize the results to 0.0 to 1.0.

Ideally, a custom implementation could scan through each pixel, iteratively spiraling out until it finds an edge pixel - my guess is that such a solution would be much more efficient than using convolutional approaches since it can stop once it finds a single edge pixel.

Anyway, before I spend effort implementing this in C++ (and then converting to Python as well - long story), is there a better, efficient approach to do what I'm trying to do provided (or supported) by OpenCV?


edit retag flag offensive reopen merge delete

Closed for the following reason the question is answered, right answer was accepted by sturkmen
close date 2020-10-05 04:27:09.825280


Maybe pointPolygonTest() can be useful

LorenaGdL gravatar imageLorenaGdL ( 2016-01-12 13:08:39 -0600 )edit

Thanks for the quick response, LorenaGdl. I'm thinking I probably won't take that approach though - I'm not sure that I could make it efficient enough for my purposes. It seems like I'd need to build a full list of contours and test each pixel against the whole list. It's certainly possible that there is no good "out-of-the-box" solution for this, so I'm prepared to build my own algorithm if need be. :)

Aenimated gravatar imageAenimated ( 2016-01-12 13:38:06 -0600 )edit

Now that I re-read your post, distanceTransform() comes also to my mind. Just giving ideas away, take them or throw them in the trash ;)

LorenaGdL gravatar imageLorenaGdL ( 2016-01-12 14:40:43 -0600 )edit

Wow, distanceTransform() looks to be exactly what I'm looking for! I'll need to do a little pre- and post-processing I think, but it looks doable. Thanks for the suggestion!

Aenimated gravatar imageAenimated ( 2016-01-12 15:17:55 -0600 )edit