This forum is disabled, please visit https://forum.opencv.org
 | 1 | initial version |
No, it isnt. doing your own C wrapper might be your best bet:
// my_api.h (w/o any opencv headers)
extern "C" {
int funny( void *there_be_pixels, int w, int h, int type );
}
// my.cpp (you'll have to compile it as c++, seperately from your other C code)
#include "opencv2/opencv.hpp"
#include "my_api.h"
int funny(void *there_be_pixels, int w, int h, int type)
{
cv::Mat m(h,h,type,there_be_pixels);
// do your c++ processing
}
the least thing you should try is, to use the legacy IplImage* based api.
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
No, it isnt. doing your own C wrapper might be your best bet:
// my_api.h (w/o any opencv headers)
extern "C" {
int funny( void *there_be_pixels, int w, int h, int type );
}
// my.cpp (you'll have to compile it as c++, seperately from your other C code)
#include "opencv2/opencv.hpp"
#include "my_api.h"
int funny(void *there_be_pixels, int w, int h, int type)
{
cv::Mat m(h,h,type,there_be_pixels);
m(h, w, type, (char*)there_be_pixels);
// do your c++ processing
}
the least thing you should try is, to use the legacy IplImage* based api.
| | 3 | No.3 Revision |
No, it isnt. doing your own C wrapper might be your best bet:
// my_api.h (w/o any opencv headers)
extern "C" {
int funny( void *there_be_pixels, int w, int h, int type );
}
// my.cpp (you'll have to compile it as c++, seperately from your other C code)
#include "opencv2/opencv.hpp"
#include "my_api.h"
int funny(void *there_be_pixels, int w, int h, int type)
{
cv::Mat m(h, w, type, (char*)there_be_pixels);
// do your c++ processing
}
the what you should leastnot thing you should try is, to use the legacy IplImage* IplImage based api.api - i't s dead, does not give you a real 'watershed', also you're only writing more unwanted legecay code this way.