1 | initial version |
Professional industrial computer vision libraries, such as Cognex or Halcon, are usually made to give a relative inexperienced user the possibility to write image processing code in a realy easy way (My point of view). So they provide some functions that combine a cluster of basic functions where as much as possible parameters are adjusted itself.
That has the advantage, that you don't have to care about a lot of problems, but the disadvantage is, that in many cases you don't know what the function really does. (I know that because I'm actually porting a Halcon written library into a OpenCV one).
Short description: You will have to do (often a lot) more handwork, but you can get faster and more accuracy code if you know what you do (not because the professional libraries are bad/slow/..., but because you can write more adapted code and debug into OpenCV code).
To your special problem: This sounds like (in a naive view):
binarize image with: cv::threshold
, cv::Canny
, ...
find contours (make problem to a 1D one): cv::findContours
choosing wanted contour using whatever
2 | No.2 Revision |
Professional industrial computer vision libraries, such as Cognex or Halcon, are usually made to give a relative inexperienced user the possibility to write image processing code in a realy easy way (My point of view). So they provide some functions that combine a cluster of basic functions where as much as possible parameters are adjusted itself.
That has the advantage, that you don't have to care about a lot of problems, but the disadvantage is, that in many cases you don't know what the function really does. (I know that because I'm actually porting a Halcon written library into a OpenCV one).
Short description: You will have to do (often a lot) more handwork, but you can get faster and more accuracy code if you know what you do (not because the professional libraries are bad/slow/..., but because you can write more adapted code and debug into OpenCV code).
To your special problem: This sounds like (in a naive view):
binarize image with: cv::threshold
, cv::Canny
, ...
find contours (make problem to a 1D one): cv::findContours
choosing wanted contour using whatever
3 | No.3 Revision |
Professional industrial computer vision libraries, such as Cognex or Halcon, are usually made to give a relative inexperienced user the possibility to write image processing code in a realy easy way (My point of view). So they provide some functions that combine a cluster of basic functions where as much as possible parameters are adjusted itself.
That has the advantage, that you don't have to care about a lot of problems, but the disadvantage is, that in many cases you don't know what the function really does. (I know that because I'm actually porting a Halcon written library into a OpenCV one).
Short description: You will have to do (often a lot) more handwork, but you can get faster and more accuracy code if you know what you do (not because the professional libraries are bad/slow/..., but because you can write more adapted code and debug into OpenCV code).
To your special problem: This sounds like (in a naive view):
binarize image with: cv::threshold
, cv::Canny
, ...
find contours (make problem to a 1D one): cv::findContours
choosing wanted contour using whatever
and do the tail by read in OpenCV docs or the next answer ;)
4 | No.4 Revision |
Professional industrial computer vision libraries, such as Cognex or Halcon, are usually made to give a relative inexperienced user the possibility to write image processing code in a realy easy way (My point of view). So they provide some functions that combine a cluster of basic functions where as much as possible parameters are adjusted itself.
That has the advantage, that you don't have to care about a lot of problems, but the disadvantage is, that in many cases you don't know what the function really does. (I know that because I'm actually porting a Halcon written library into a OpenCV one).
Short description: You will have to do (often a lot) more handwork, but you can get faster and more accuracy code if you know what you do (not because the professional libraries are bad/slow/..., but because you can write more adapted code and debug into OpenCV code).
To your special problem: This sounds like (in a naive view):
binarize image with: cv::threshold
, cv::Canny
, ...
find contours (make problem to a 1D one): cv::findContours
choosing wanted contour using whatever
and do the tail by read in OpenCV docs or the next answer ;)
5 | No.5 Revision |
Professional industrial computer vision libraries, such as Cognex or Halcon, are usually made to give a relative inexperienced user the possibility to write image processing code in a realy easy way (My point of view). So they provide some functions that combine a cluster of basic functions where as much as possible parameters are adjusted itself.
That has the advantage, that you don't have to care about a lot of problems, but the disadvantage is, that in many cases you don't know what the function really does. (I know that because I'm actually porting a Halcon written library into a OpenCV one).
Short description: You will have to do (often a lot) more handwork, but you can get faster and more accuracy code if you know what you do (not because the professional libraries are bad/slow/..., but because you can write more adapted code and debug into OpenCV code).
To your special problem: This sounds like (in a naive view):
binarize image with: cv::threshold
, cv::Canny
, ...
find contours (make problem to a 1D one): cv::findContours
choosing wanted contour using whatever
and do the tail by read in OpenCV docs or the next answer ;) (But as far as I understoodd he has to extract the object ROI after identifying the obkect)
6 | No.6 Revision |
Professional industrial computer vision libraries, such as Cognex or Halcon, are usually made to give a relative inexperienced user the possibility to write image processing code in a realy easy way (My point of view). So they provide some functions that combine a cluster of basic functions where as much as possible parameters are adjusted itself.
That has the advantage, that you don't have to care about a lot of problems, but the disadvantage is, that in many cases you don't know what the function really does. (I know that because I'm actually porting a Halcon written library into a OpenCV one).
Short description: You will have to do (often a lot) more handwork, but you can get faster and more accuracy code if you know what you do (not because the professional libraries are bad/slow/..., but because you can write more adapted code and debug into OpenCV code).
To your special problem: This sounds like (in a naive view):
binarize image with: cv::threshold
, cv::Canny
, ...
find contours (make problem to a 1D one): cv::findContours
choosing wanted contour using whatever
and do the tail by read in OpenCV docs or the next previous answer ;) (But as far as I understoodd he has to extract the object ROI after identifying the object)
7 | No.7 Revision |
Professional industrial computer vision libraries, such as Cognex or Halcon, are usually made to give a relative inexperienced user the possibility to write image processing code in a realy easy way (My point of view). So they provide some functions that combine a cluster of basic functions where as much as possible parameters are adjusted itself.
That has the advantage, that you don't have to care about a lot of problems, but the disadvantage is, that in many cases you don't know what the function really does. (I know that because I'm actually porting a Halcon written library into a OpenCV one).
Short description: You will have to do (often a lot) more handwork, but you can get faster and more accuracy code if you know what you do (not because the professional libraries are bad/slow/..., but because you can write more adapted code and debug into OpenCV code).
To your special problem: This sounds like (in a naive view):
binarize image with: cv::threshold
, cv::Canny
, ...
find contours (make problem to a 1D one): cv::findContours
choosing wanted contour using whatever
and do the tail by read in OpenCV docs or the previous answer ;) (But as far as I understoodd understood he has to extract the object ROI after identifying the object)