This forum is disabled, please visit https://forum.opencv.org
 | 1 | initial version |
Well, the Assertion is saying that the number of channels is wrong. Best guess is that you still have color when you need to go either grey (or extract one of the BGR components). I thought the imread should have handled that but the flag to convert to grey is not explicit. Try src = imread("Filename", 0); //0 for grey, 1 for color.
The step you reference (line numbers please!) is where the complex dimension gets added to the image data. It looks like you copied the tutorial verbatim. Is padded bigger than I at this point as it should be?
Otherwise, I'm just trying to read through the tutorial. It looks like you copied that anyway, why not run that with your image? Then let me know how you get the angle!
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
Well, the Assertion is saying that the number of channels is wrong. Best guess is that you still have color when you need to go either grey (or extract one of the BGR components). I thought the imread should have handled that but the flag to convert to grey is not explicit. Try src = imread("Filename", 0); //0 for grey, 1 for color.
The step you reference (line numbers please!) is where the complex dimension gets added to the image data. It looks like you copied the tutorial verbatim. Is padded bigger than I at this point as it should be?
Otherwise, I'm just trying to read through the tutorial. It looks like you copied that anyway, why not run that with your image? Then let me know how you get the angle!
EDIT
I think the spirit of the original question was how to interpret results like these:
| | 3 | No.3 Revision |
Well, the Assertion is saying that the number of channels is wrong. Best guess is that you still have color when you need to go either grey (or extract one of the BGR components). I thought the imread should have handled that but the flag to convert to grey is not explicit. Try src = imread("Filename", 0); //0 for grey, 1 for color.
The step you reference (line numbers please!) is where the complex dimension gets added to the image data. It looks like you copied the tutorial verbatim. Is padded bigger than I at this point as it should be?
Otherwise, I'm just trying to read through the tutorial. It looks like you copied that anyway, why not run that with your image? Then let me know how you get the angle!
EDIT
I think the spirit of the original question was how to interpret results like these:
EDIT Pulling out phase as suggested. Similar quadrant swap but not log scale of course.
