Revision history [back]

1. Question: Yes, just access the data-field. e.g.

   cv::Mat1f a(2,2); float* matrix_data = (float*) a.data; // Note: static cast is probably more apropriate

Note: that the matrix_data will be de-allocated if the matrix a loses its scope, so a safer way would be to copy it (e.g. using memcpy).

1. Question: yes you can put a matrix-header on top of your data.

   float* matrix_data = new float[1]; matrix_data = 123.0; cv::Mat1f a(1,1,matrix_data);

The same also works with std::vector.

By the way: I would always keep the data, i.e. your images, as matrices: 1. it is safer (no own memore allocations/deletions needed) and 2. it makes the code easier to read and to use.

1. Question: Yes, just access the data-field. e.g.

   cv::Mat1f a(2,2); float* matrix_data = (float*) a.data; // Note: static cast is probably more apropriate

Note: that the matrix_data will be de-allocated if the matrix a loses its scope, so a safer way would be to copy it (e.g. using memcpy).

1. Question: yes you can put a matrix-header on top of your data.

   float* matrix_data = new float[1]; matrix_data = 123.0; cv::Mat1f a(1,1,matrix_data);

The same also works with std::vector.

By the way: I would always keep the data, i.e. your images, as matrices: 1. it is safer (no own memore allocations/deletions needed) and 2. it makes the code easier to read and to use.