1 | initial version |
Without having seen the implementation, my guess is that it's image_size * filter_size, i.e. n²*m², like with "regular" filtering.
A few weeks ago, I stumbled upon a paper that claimed a O(1) filter (with certain restrictions for the filter), but I don't know the details.
2 | No.2 Revision |
Without having seen the implementation, my guess is that it's image_size * filter_size, i.e. n²*m², n²*m², like with for "regular" filtering.
A few weeks ago, I stumbled upon a paper that claimed a O(1) filter (with certain restrictions for the filter), but I don't know the details.