2016-04-20 07:51:07 -0600 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-07 14:06:59 -0600 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-03-01 14:43:29 -0600 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2013-11-12 09:27:51 -0600 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-04-07 17:08:01 -0600 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2012-11-09 07:59:05 -0600 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
2012-10-31 09:24:25 -0600 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2012-08-29 05:49:33 -0600 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2012-08-29 05:48:58 -0600 | answered a question | LSH matching very slow I fixed it. I played a bit with the parameters of LSH and changed them to LshIndexParams(8, 30, 2). Now i'm down to 0.4 seconds for 2000 descriptors, which is fast enough for my problem. Thanks to everyone! |
2012-08-27 10:01:59 -0600 | commented answer | LSH matching very slow Maybe using LSH is not that much better than BF in this case, but i think it should be at least near the performance of the BF matching for small datasets. With the 1000 descriptors i used, LSH needs about 30-40 seconds. Using 1000 times the number of descriptors wont speed up the matching magically. So i guess there has to be some problem with my code or OpenCV. Does your code look similar to the one i use? Could you post it? |
2012-08-21 13:20:38 -0600 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2012-07-31 15:23:51 -0600 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-07-30 11:59:50 -0600 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2012-07-30 11:58:51 -0600 | asked a question | LSH matching very slow Hey guys and girls, I'm testing a recognition pipeline using ORB descriptors. I recently changed the matcher from bruteforce to flann, using the new LSH index. Unfortunately the LSH matching is about 5-6 times slower than bruteforce using about 1000 descriptors as a database. Has anybody experienced similar problems? Is the LSH code still under development? Current git commit hash: 72a4f19. Part of the code: |